On 20 July 2001 Hans Romanov, Frankfurt promoter and "scene
pope" with domiciles between Paris and Berlin, spontaneously celebrated
his birthday in the "morgen" basement vaults and distributed this
announcement openly in mailing lists and electronic party distribution lists
in Frankfurt. Out of a sudden, this place was known to a larger party community.
Shortly after, a
virtual
flyer announced the vernissage of a friendly artist, again in the morgen
gallery rooms.
The places of New Entrepreneurs have a headstrong policy: To make them existent
in the minds of people requires a specific place policy that re-negotiates
belonging:
morgen is a meeting point of an open but still clearly outlined group of friends,
colleagues, competitors, interested and curious people. Perception of this
place requires a steering policy which is similar to that of a club: Being
rejected by a bouncer is much more subtle and subcutaneous. Different information
routes, such as word-of-mouth-recommendation, mailing lists and flyers ensure
a targeted distribution of upcoming events, vernissages, new products. Beside
the distribution of information there are also repeated attempts at making
the "morgen" place disappear from the scene. For months on end,
nothing is happening there, the underlying play is to balance out the visitors,
disguise the place and bring it back to awareness. Tritsch/Mühlbauer
do without an annual program and announce their art exhibitions at short notice,
by sending invites via mailing list to selected interested persons and friends
in Frankfurt's art scene: Being among those who belong (or not) to the thus
obvious "scene" that can be read in the mail header is the in- or
exclusion criterion which is never broached in public.
The strategy of concealing that becomes manifest in the process picks up an
attitude that reminds of the old socialist service mentality: the customer
is not "king" and business does not matter.
All the more so, since the "morgen" place does not clearly reveal
itself visually as such but is only perceived as a place of events and performances
by insiders and "those in the know". Positioning of the "morgen"
place with its concealing policy in urban space does not only generate a social
difference but, above all, the broad masses are left outside.
>>>
Even if diligent seekers manage to find the place, there is a second differentiation
criterion subtly implemented into the place. Thus, the parties after vernissages
provide identification patterns among the visitors via the exhibited art,
electronic music. Only the assignment to those patterns - based on the experienceability
of this performance - facilitates the formative participation in the event.
This embodies the subtle ostracising strategy: Nobody is sent away, rather
everybody is admitted, but only a few are integrated. And also this initial
integration is an exhortation to permanently making sure of one's belonging.
Since the irregular changing of this "location" is, for the time
being, the guaranty that no trend is being set, no financial dependencies
are generated and commercialism does not obstruct creative activity.
Hence, it is these splits within the permanent change of the differentiation
criteria, the avoidance of pure commercialisation and the adoption of concealing
strategies that ensure those places' and their actors' survival for a certain
time. If they positioned themselves as clear, overt counterconcepts to existing
cultural and societal currents ("underground" model) they would
be - as would happen when they chose the "mainstream" model - immediately
processed by the urban trend machine and destroyed.
>>>